TSA (Transition Services Agreement)
A TSA (Transition Services Agreement) is the contract under which the seller agrees to continue providing operational services to the buyer for a defined period after closing. It is used when the sold business depends on systems, people, or infrastructure that remains with the seller — accounting, payroll, technology, logistics, or shared administrative services. The TSA allows the transaction to close before operational separation is complete, with a structured plan to transfer each function to the buyer on defined timelines.
When is a TSA needed?
A TSA is needed when the acquired business cannot operate independently from day one. This occurs in three specific situations in Mexican SME M&A:
Carve-outs: When the seller divests a business unit that shares systems, people, or infrastructure with the retained business. The separated unit needs time to replicate those functions independently. Without a TSA, the buyer receives an asset it cannot operate. See carve-out.
Technology dependency: When the business runs on ERP, accounting, or operating systems owned by the seller’s parent or a related party. The buyer needs time to migrate to its own systems. A TSA provides continuity while migration occurs.
Shared administrative services: When accounting, HR, payroll, legal, or IT are provided by a shared services center that stays with the seller. The buyer cannot replicate those functions overnight — the TSA bridges the gap.
In founder-owned businesses the TSA is less common but not rare. It appears when the founder provides post-closing operational functions — managing key customer relationships, overseeing a production process, or supporting a technology platform they built.
What must a TSA contain?
Six elements every TSA should define:
Services covered: A detailed schedule of each service the seller will provide — accounting, payroll, IT support, logistics, legal, administrative. Each service described specifically. Vague descriptions create disputes.
Duration per service: Not all services transfer at the same speed. A TSA should define a schedule per service — accounting migration may take 3 months, IT migration 6 months, payroll transfer 1 month. Each service has its own exit date.
Price: How the seller is compensated for providing post-closing services. Options: cost-plus (seller’s cost plus a margin), fixed fee per service, or bundled monthly fee. In Mexican SME transactions, fixed fee per service is more common.
Service standards: The level of service the seller must maintain — same as pre-closing or defined minimum standards. Without this, the seller may provide degraded service and the buyer has no contractual basis to object.
Early termination: Either party must be able to exit a service early if the buyer completes migration ahead of schedule. Define notice period and any early termination fee.
Liability: Caps on liability for service failures. The seller is not an insurer — the TSA should define what happens if a service fails and what damages are recoverable.
For when to negotiate the TSA in the M&A process, what to agree in the LOI, and practice in Mexico, see the TSA in M&A Mexico guide.
What is the typical TSA duration in SME transactions?
In Mexican SME M&A, TSA durations range from 3 to 18 months depending on separation complexity.
| Service type | Typical duration |
|---|---|
| Simple administrative services (basic accounting, payroll) | 3–6 months |
| Technology migrations and operational separations | 6–12 months |
| Complex carve-outs with deep system integration | Up to 18 months |
The buyer wants the shortest possible TSA — dependence on the seller post-closing creates operational risk and limits the buyer’s ability to integrate the business. The seller wants the TSA to end as soon as possible — providing services to a business you no longer own is a distraction with limited benefit.
Both incentives align toward a short, well-defined TSA with clear exit dates per service. The risk is underestimating migration complexity — a TSA that expires before the buyer is ready creates an operational crisis.
What does a real TSA case look like?
A packaging manufacturer divested its distribution division to a logistics operator. The distribution division had no independent accounting system, shared a WMS (warehouse management system) with the manufacturing operation, and its payroll was processed by the manufacturer’s HR department. The TSA covered three services:
| Service | Duration | Cost/month (MXN) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting | 6 months | 45,000.00 | Fixed fee |
| WMS access | 9 months | 28,000.00 | Migration at buyer’s expense |
| Payroll processing | 3 months | 12,000.00 | — |
| Total TSA value (transition period) | 747,000.00 | — | |
The buyer completed accounting migration in month 4 (one month early), triggered early termination and saved MXN 45,000. WMS migration ran through month 9 as planned. Payroll transferred in month 3 as scheduled. The TSA closed cleanly with no disputes — because each service had scope, price, and exit date defined from day one.
What are the TSA risks for buyer and seller?
| Party | Main risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer | Dependence on seller post-closing; service quality may degrade or be deprioritized. | Defined service standards, clear escalation, incentives for early exit. |
| Seller | Scope creep when the buyer asks for more than agreed and the schedule is vague. | Detailed schedule with explicit exclusions, change order for out-of-scope. |
What do buyers and sellers ask about the TSA?
- Is a TSA mandatory in an M&A transaction?
- No. A TSA is only necessary when the acquired business cannot operate independently from closing. In most founder-owned SME transactions where the business has its own systems and people, a TSA is not necessary. It becomes necessary in carve-outs, businesses with shared infrastructure, or when the founder provides specific operational functions that need time to be transferred.
- Who pays for TSA services?
- The buyer pays. The TSA is a post-closing services agreement where the seller provides services at an agreed price. The cost is factored into the economics of the deal — a buyer that needs 12 months of accounting services at MXN 45,000/month must model that MXN 540,000 as part of total transaction cost, not as a surprise after closing.
- What happens if the seller does not perform under the TSA?
- The buyer may claim damages under the TSA contract. In practice, the remedy depends on how well the TSA defines service standards and liability caps. A TSA with vague standards is hard to enforce. The best mitigation is a well-drafted TSA with specific performance obligations, not litigation after a failure.
- Can the TSA be extended beyond the original term?
- Yes, by mutual agreement. Extensions are common when migration takes longer than planned. The TSA should include a mechanism for extension — notice period, price for the extended period (often at a higher rate to incentivize the buyer to complete migration on time), and a maximum extension term.
In this glossary:
Carve-out — where the TSA is most common.
LOI — where the need for a TSA is agreed.
Data room — where the separation the TSA facilitates is documented.
Due diligence — where the need for a TSA is evaluated.
Earn-out — mechanism that can complement the TSA.
Sources
- Dibbell, Julian M. — Negotiating Transition Services Agreements in Carve-Out M&A Deals, Mayer Brown (2024)
- Melby, Barbara Murphy — Key Considerations for Transition Services Agreements in M&A Transactions, The National Law Review, Vol. XVI, No. 55 (2015)
- Norton Rose Fulbright — Transition services agreements in M&A deals – buyer beware, Lexology (2013)
A well-structured TSA allows the transaction to close without disrupting the acquired business’s operations. How it fits into the sale process in Mexico is covered in the guide to selling a business in Mexico.
Stay updated: